Skip to content
Man performing a single-arm dumbbell row on a flat bench in the gym

Full Body vs. Split: Which Training Plan Fits You?

· Chris · 5 min read

“Should I do full body or a split?” The answer depends on a single variable: how many days per week can you train? Everything else follows from that.

This article compares the four most common splits — with concrete recommendations, not “it depends.”

The 4 Most Common Splits

1. Full Body

Every session trains all major muscle groups. 1-2 exercises per muscle group, 2-3 training days per week.

Frequency: 2-3× per muscle group/week Typical time commitment: 45-60 minutes per session

Pros:

  • Highest frequency per muscle group with few training days
  • Perfect for beginners
  • Flexible scheduling (Mon-Wed-Fri, Tue-Thu-Sat, etc.)
  • Every training day stimulates muscle growth across your whole body

Cons:

  • Limited exercise variation per muscle group (1-2 exercises max)
  • Sessions get long at high volume (70+ minutes)
  • Less suited for high volume per muscle group (16+ sets)

For: Beginners (0-12 months), lifters with 2-3 training days/week. Structured full-body programs: Greyskull LP (AMRAP-based) or GZCLP (4-day variant with tier system).

2. Upper/Lower

Days 1+3: Upper body (chest, back, shoulders, arms). Days 2+4: Lower body (quads, hamstrings, calves, abs).

Frequency: 2× per muscle group/week Typical time commitment: 50-70 minutes per session

Pros:

  • Good balance of frequency and volume per session
  • Room for 3-4 exercises per muscle group
  • Flexible (Mon-Tue-Thu-Fri or Mon-Wed-Thu-Sat)
  • Allows heavy/light variation (Upper A heavy, Upper B volume)

Cons:

  • Requires 4 training days
  • Lower body days can be brutal (squats + deadlifts + accessories)

For: Intermediates (6+ months), lifters with 4 training days/week. Popular upper/lower programs with DUP structure: PHUL and PHAT.

3. Push/Pull/Legs (PPL)

Push: chest, shoulders, triceps. Pull: back, biceps, rear delts. Legs: quads, hamstrings, calves, abs.

Frequency: 1-2× per muscle group/week (depending on variant) Typical time commitment: 50-75 minutes per session

Pros:

  • Maximum exercise variation per muscle group
  • High volume per session possible without your whole body being wrecked
  • No conflict between muscle groups (triceps only fatigued on push day)

Cons:

  • 6 training days for 2× frequency — high time commitment
  • At only 3 days/week: only 1× frequency (suboptimal)
  • High discipline needed to not skip leg day

For: Intermediates to advanced with 5-6 training days/week.

4. Bro Split (1 Muscle Group/Day)

Monday chest, Tuesday back, Wednesday shoulders, Thursday arms, Friday legs. Each muscle group 1× per week.

Frequency: 1× per muscle group/week Typical time commitment: 50-70 minutes per session

Pros:

  • Maximum volume per muscle group per session
  • Simple planning (Monday = chest, always)
  • Popular and well-documented

Cons:

  • Only 1× frequency — substantially worse than 2×
  • 5-7 days between training stimuli for the same muscle
  • Growth stimulus only active 1× per week

For: Generally not recommended. Research on training frequency clearly shows: 2× per week is superior to 1×. If you train 5 days, PPL is the better choice.

Comparison Table

Full BodyUpper/LowerPPLBro Split
Days/Week2-345-65
Frequency2-3×
Volume/SessionLow-MediumMediumMedium-HighHigh
Exercises/Muscle1-22-33-44-5
Session Duration45-60 min50-70 min50-75 min50-70 min
BeginnerPerfectGoodToo muchSuboptimal
IntermediateGoodPerfectGoodSuboptimal
AdvancedPossibleGoodPerfectOkay

Decision Guide: How Many Days Per Week?

The decision is simple:

2 days → Full body. No alternative.

3 days → Full body. Rotating upper/lower is possible but inconsistent.

4 days → Upper/lower. The most efficient 4-day distribution.

5 days → Rotating PPL (Push-Pull-Legs-Push-Pull one week, Legs-Push-Pull-Legs-Push the next) or upper/lower + 1 extra day for weak points.

6 days → PPL-PPL. Every muscle group 2× with maximum volume.

The honest recommendation: Most lifters do best with 4 days upper/lower. It’s the sweet spot of frequency (2×), volume per session (enough for progress), and lifestyle compatibility (2 rest days).

Can I Switch My Split?

Yes — and you should when your circumstances change. Moving from full body to upper/lower after 6-12 months is the natural transition when you need more volume and can fit in a fourth day.

Important: don’t switch your split because you’re bored. Switch it when your current split no longer fits your volume needs or time budget.

How hitPR Supports Different Splits

hitPR has ready-made plans for each split in the catalog:

Full Body 3 Days: The Basic Beginner Routine — 3 exercises per session, all 3×5+ with AMRAP on the last set, linear progression (+2.5 kg upper body, +5 kg lower body). Deload after 2 failures. As simple as it gets.

Full Body 3 Days, Dumbbells Only: The Dumbbell Foundation — 3 exercises per session, double progression (8-10 reps, when you hit all reps → weight goes up). For anyone without a rack.

Upper/Lower 4 Days: Upper/Lower with A/B variation — upper days with 7 exercises, lower days with 5, all double progression.

Full Body 2 Days: Full Body Essentials — for when more than two sessions a week simply isn’t realistic.

Full Body 3 Days, hypertrophy focus: Full Body Hypertrophy — more volume per muscle group than the beginner routine, less focused on pure strength.

5 Days, hybrid: Upper/Lower + PPL Hybrid — for when four days are too few and six are too many.

Pick a plan, enter your starting weights, train.

Bottom Line

The best split is the one you can consistently execute. At least 2× frequency, enough volume, progressive overload — those are the basics. Which split delivers that depends on your available training days — not your Instagram feed. For a comparison of popular established programs that work within these splits, see Reddit Training Programs Compared.


Sources

  • Schoenfeld BJ et al. (2016). Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy. Sports Medicine, 46(11):1689-1697.
  • ACSM (2009). Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(3):687-708.

Frequently Asked Questions

Share

Related Articles